Thursday, December 05, 2013

Good news for zero tolerance policies and Broward County

For once, good news out of Florida. [Link]
We've written several times about the ridiculous and tragic outcomes of school zero tolerance policies, especially when enforced by "resource officers" (the more child-friendly term for law enforcement officers deployed in schools).

Zero tolerance policies have been on the rise since the mid-90's, thanks to the War on Drugs. High profile school shootings over the past decade have only made these policies worse, as did tying school funding to certain enforcement measures. The problem with these policies is they remove any nuance from discipline, leading to a pop tart bitten into the shape of a gun being treated with the same severity as an actual weapon.

These policies don't solely affect drug and gun possession. They have also been rewritten to covermany other infractions, thanks to the (perceived) rise in bullying and cyberbullying. The end result has been an increase in suspensions, expulsions and arrests, frequently over disciplinary problems that would have been handled in a more rational fashion (and by school administrators, rather than LEOs) before these policies were put in place.

It now appears some schools around the nation are realizing these policies have done more harm than good.
Faced with mounting evidence that get-tough policies in schools are leading to arrest records, low academic achievement and high dropout rates that especially affect minority students, cities and school districts around the country are rethinking their approach to minor offenses.

Perhaps nowhere has the shift been more pronounced than in Broward County’s public schools. Two years ago, the school district achieved an ignominious Florida record: More students were arrested on school campuses here than in any other state district, the vast majority for misdemeanors like possessing marijuana or spraying graffiti.
By removing administrators' ability to tailor punishments to the student by considering extenuating circumstances, zero tolerance policies have demanded a perverse form of consistency that results in large numbers of suspensions and arrests. Now, schools are starting to realize that these actions only lead to further problems and further separation of at-risk students from an education.
Rather than push children out of school, districts like Broward are now doing the opposite: choosing to keep lawbreaking students in school, away from trouble on the streets, and offering them counseling and other assistance aimed at changing behavior.

These alternative efforts are increasingly supported, sometimes even led, by state juvenile justice directors, judges and police officers.

2 comments:

bunny42 said...

Sean has said that zero tolerance policies serve to eliminate the need for school administrators, since there's no decision making required. With these newer policies administrators are being forced to, you know, administrate. Meting out discipline on a case-by-case basis requires giving thoughtful consideration to each incident and the surrounding circumstances. I hope the so-called administrators are up to the task. It is my hope that the majority of them have felt hamstrung by ridiculous zero tolerance policies and will embrace these changes enthusiastically. I remain ever the dreamer. (But I'm not the only one.)

Jeff said...

Bureaucracy never shrinks, and regulations always get longer. The zero tolerance policies were put in place as a legal CYA to prevent lawsuits. You can't sue (successfully) if the policies were followed.

Post a Comment