Tuesday, July 07, 2009

On being labeled Conservative

I don't feel conservative, I hold a lot of liberal views, yet I have been labeled a conservative. This pretty much matches up with my experience. [Link]

Just to be clear, yes, I supported the war, and yes, I ridiculed the idea that Bush was a Nazi and that 9/11 was an inside job. That being the case, I became tagged with the "conservative" label no matter how many times I said I was a libertarian. This debate (in which my libertarianism was attacked as suspect) is typical, and I lost track of the number of times I was called a conservative (and worse) by lefties. But hey, I'm one of those annoying snots who rejects all labels and refuses to be bound by them, so I contemptuously ignored most of these references.

Times have changed. It now seems that supporting the war, not believing 9/11 was an inside job, and opposing the belief that Bush is a Nazi are no longer conservative positions. Even foot dragging on Gitmo has become suspiciously liberal.

Where does that leave the previously labeled conservatives?

Why, they're supposed to be dragged into a contest. Something involving "conservative principles." What are they? Beats me, as it seems to depend on whom you ask. To some, it's enough simply to be against big government, or statism. But to others, you also have to be against all things which are said to threaten "family values."

Social and religious conservatives often use the term "family values" to promote conservative ideology that supports traditional morality or values.[2] American Christians often see their religion as the source of morality and consider the nuclear family to be an essential element in society. Some conservative family values advocates believe the government should endorse Christian morality,[3] for example by displaying the Ten Commandments or allowing teachers to conduct prayers in public schools. Religious conservatives often view the United States as a "Christian nation".[4] For example, the American Family Association, says "The American Family Association exists to motivate and equip citizens to change the culture to reflect Biblical truth and traditional family values."[5] These groups variously oppose abortion, pornography, pre-marital sex, homosexuality, some aspects of feminism,[6] cohabitation, and depictions of sexuality in the media.
I don't know how accurate the above list is, but it does not articulate either my political positions or many of my political principles, and to the extent it defines "conservatism," then I cannot truthfully be said to be a conservative, regardless of how devoutly I support the war, and regardless of how much I doubt Bush's Nazism and 9/11 involvement.

2 comments:

bunny42 said...

For quite some time, now, I have been feeling disenfranchised by the Republican Party, for these very reasons. It seems that the only real planks in the platform concern so-called family values and religious conservatism. I'm a strong supporter of the military, the war on terror, smaller government, lower taxes, etc. But the emphasis on hard-right conservatism is leaving me out of the equation. There's no room for anybody who favors embryonic stem cell research or who doesn't think same-sex marriage is the end of the world as we know it.

I used to think Libertarians were a bunch of whackos and conspiracy theorists, but now I'm not so sure. Perhaps the time for a viable third party alternative has arrived.

Jeff said...

I think we're both little 'L' libertarians rather than big 'L' Libertarians.

The "whackos and conspiracy theorists" tend to be big 'L' Libertarians.

I just want less government overall, and for what there is required for it to stay out of our affairs.

Post a Comment