"What we seem to be left with, is that computer climate models exclude many of the most important parameters contributing to real world climate. Of the parameters that are included, several of them appear to be based upon sloppy — even faith-based — assumptions. No wonder they fail the test of observation. They are no better than the predictions of psychic grifters." Sure, climate is changing, (it is always changing), but when the models _always_ show higher predictions than measured reality, there is a bias. This, along with 'losing' raw data, and dropping weather stations from the models that record lower temperature in favor of those with higher temperatures, lead me to beleive there are shenanigans going on. This is why I am skeptical.
Why are Climate Models so Estranged from Reality
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment